The Man from Yesterday (1932):
Directed by: Berthold Viertel.
Cast: Claudette Colbert, Clice Brook, Charles Boyer, Andy Devine.
When nurse, Sylvia (Claudette Colbert) is working with French doctor, Rene Gaudin (Charles Boyer) under WWI she discovers that her husband Tony (Clive Brook) has been killed, but unknown to her, he has survived, though not by much. She gets a little boy by Tony (Clive Brook) and when she falls in love with Rene (Charles Boyer), they eventually marry. Circumstances become complicated when Tony ends up in the same hospital as Dr. Rene Gaudin and Sylvia.
I found the film really engaging and interesting, though a lot of people seem to disagree. The strength of the film is Claudette Colbert and Charles Boyer's performances and their illicit chemistry, as Clive Brook always had a tendency to be too stiff and upper-lipped, however he does give a convincing performance as the gradually dying soldier.
It's no secret that Claudette Colbert and Charles Boyer are huge favourites of mine. Here's some background information to the film from the book, Claudette Colbert - An illustrated Biography by Lawrence J. Quick:
- "Claudette Colbert is credited by many film commentators with having launched the hollywood career of her fellow-countryman, Charles Boyer, who often paid tribute to her kindness and help during their first picture, The Man From yesterday, in 1932. For one thing, Boyer, who was new to Hollywood and to the English language, found himself lonely and bewildered in a Hollywood that seemed to take scans notice of him. He had done French-speaking versions of various films, and then had had a bad experience with The Magnificent Lie (1931). (...) Discouraged with the Hollywood sojourn, Boyer had returned to France, but Colbert, who admired him greatly and saw potential perhaps more clearly that anyone, insisted he be brought back for the third lead in a picture she was doing with Clive Brook. (...) Boyer, who in his French stage and film productions was accustomed to directors who worked to deepen characterization and patiently highlighted their performances' best points, found his second go-round with Viertel (= director, Berthel Viertel whom he done The Magnificent life (1931) with) a trial. (...) as Boyer remembered it, a total lack what became known in later decades as communication.
Throughout all this, Boyer found Colbert a pillar of strength; For One thing, he could lay aside his still-halting English to chat happily with her in the French they both knew as natives. When Viertel left him completely at sea regarding the proper interpretation of a scene, Colbert was always there with whispered encouragement in French, and suggestions as to how the emotional mood of the scene could be maintained. In later years, Boyer often cited Colbert's constant encouragement and advice as the reason why he came through most effectively in this picture. For the first time, Irving Thalberg at MGM, who had had him under option, and other producers began to see possibilities in him.- He admitted in retrospect that he had found English a particularly difficult language to master. He recalled that in one scene, in which he was required to stand by Colbert's bed after she had given birth, with a newborn baby in its crib, he was completely at a loss as to the proper emotional mood to project, since Viertel had told him to "use his imagination". The most imaginative of actors, Boyer was also the most meticulous, and liked to blend his moods with the actor sharing the scene. Again Colbert came to his rescue with advice.(...)"
The Misleading Lady (1932):

Directed by: Stuart Walker.
Cast: Claudette Colbert, Edmund Lowe, George Meeker.
A solid and enjoyable Pre-Code romance with a cast that clearly had fun while making it, but ultimately, the film has its flaws!
When an outgoing socialite, Helen Steele (Claudette Colbert) decides to become an actress, she tries to convince a stage producer that she is right for the part as a siren, in his upcoming play. To get the part, she promises him that she can win the love of, Jack Craigen (Edmund Lowe) and get him to propose to her within three days. She succeeds, but not without consequences and he abducts her. Meanwhile, they meet a lunatic on the run (Stuart Erwin).


Claudette Colbert is almost the sole reason why this film is worth the viewing pleasure, as she clearly is the most talented of the whole cast. Edmund Lowe who was married to Lilyan Tashman at the time and had been a leading man since the silent era, is pretty solid in his performance. However, due to his part being rather misogynistic and old-fashioned in nature, it makes his character less likable. When Jack (Edmund Lowe) abducts Helen (Claudette Colbert) he literally traps her, strips her and chains her. Claudette Colbert really gets pushed around throughout most of the film, as it is only in the beginning that she has some kind of female empowerment.
The film has its pre-code elements (especially when he strips her) and the film also has some of the later screwball elements with its sophistication, farcical situations (when he abducts her) and sex.
The figh scenes between Claudette Colbert and Edmund Lowe, reminded me of Private Lives (1931) with Norma Shearer and Robert Montgomery which is a much superior film and play as well. I guess it reminded me of that film, because in both films they're fighting violently in a little cottage.
In many comedies, crazy people often believe they're Napoleon (like in, Arsenic and Old Lace (1944)). That's what we see here, in the character played by Stuart Erwin.


Ultimately, the film feels too much like a stage play, as it indeed was based on a play by Charles W.Goddard and Paul Dickey. However, the cast clearly had fun making the film and it rubs off on the viewer and makes the film more enjoyable, at least it did with me. Especially, Claudette Colbert and Edmund Lowe look like they really had fun together. Edmund Lowe always seemed to have great things to say about her. Here is some quotes from the book, Claudette Colbert - An illustrated Biography by Lawrence J. Quick:
"Now there's a woman I wish I had done more films with." and on another occasion, "She was stage-trained, and she had a wonderful poise and dignity along with her sexiness - and believe you me, she was sexy. One guy I knew had an idea she was waiflike after seeing her in some picture, I think it was The Smiling Lieutenant, and I remember that when The Sign of the Cross and Cleopatra came out, I marched him to a screeningg room to view her in those. I remember him coming out and saying, 'why that dame's hot as hell!'"
When asked what he thought was the secret of her enduring success, "She's on top of things. She's in control at all times. I don't mean control in a domineering sense, just control of whatever situation is thrown at her. She always had a level head and saw through people, and I don't think she ever let any sex-pot references go to her head. Unlike some of the others who let it go to their heads, then landed on their fannies, she was level-headed, watched her roles, watched her money, knew what she wanted and went after it. I can tell you that my wife Lilyan Tashman, who worked with her (she had made The Wiser Sex with her, before Edmund Lowe made Misleading Lady with Colbert), thought she was the most professional of actresses, that she had class and breeding, yet a fey, wonderful sexy quality to her, too. Lilyan used to say, 'Don't let me catch you fooling with her off the set,' though when I made that film with her, I felt at the time she meant it as a joke; now I'm not so sure.... If I hadn't been married at the time, God knows what would have happened. Of course it took two to tango and I have no idea what Claudette's reaction would have been - she was married too, at the time."
That was it for Part 2 :)
Next up on ClassicMaiden: French film reviews, including Le Boucher (1970).


























































































The English playwright, Noel Coward (also a composer, singer, actor and director) can be credited as having written the plays to some of my favourite films, like Design For Living (1933) and Private Lives (1931) which both contains risqué dialog for their time, as well as having written the screenplay to, Brief Encounter (1945) which apparently was based upon his 1936 one-act play, Still Life. 
























